alexcrichton opened PR #10235 from alexcrichton:update-wasm-tools
to bytecodealliance:main
:
This commit updates the wasm-tools crates to the 226 track of versions. The most notable change here is the removal and refactoring within wasm-tools of support for multiple and named returns in the component model along with the support for 33+ flags in the
flags
type. This has been gated for some time now and it's just now being removed now that it's been awhile an no issues have been raised.<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
alexcrichton commented on PR #10235:
I'll note that this is a draft because I haven't actually published anything yet on the wasm-tools side of things.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #10235:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @fitzgen
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "fuzzing", "wasmtime:api", "wasmtime:config"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- fitzgen: fuzzing
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #10235:
Label Messager: wasmtime:config
It looks like you are changing Wasmtime's configuration options. Make sure to
complete this check list:
[ ] If you added a new
Config
method, you wrote extensive documentation for
it.<details>
Our documentation should be of the following form:
```text
Short, simple summary sentence.More details. These details can be multiple paragraphs. There should be
information about not just the method, but its parameters and results as
well.Is this method fallible? If so, when can it return an error?
Can this method panic? If so, when does it panic?
Example
Optional example here.
```</details>
[ ] If you added a new
Config
method, or modified an existing one, you
ensured that this configuration is exercised by the fuzz targets.<details>
For example, if you expose a new strategy for allocating the next instance
slot inside the pooling allocator, you should ensure that at least one of our
fuzz targets exercises that new strategy.Often, all that is required of you is to ensure that there is a knob for this
configuration option in [wasmtime_fuzzing::Config
][fuzzing-config] (or one
of its nestedstruct
s).Rarely, this may require authoring a new fuzz target to specifically test this
configuration. See [our docs on fuzzing][fuzzing-docs] for more details.</details>
[ ] If you are enabling a configuration option by default, make sure that it
has been fuzzed for at least two weeks before turning it on by default.[fuzzing-config]: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/ca0e8d0a1d8cefc0496dba2f77a670571d8fdcab/crates/fuzzing/src/generators.rs#L182-L194
[fuzzing-docs]: https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-fuzzing.html
<details>
To modify this label's message, edit the <code>.github/label-messager/wasmtime-config.md</code> file.
To add new label messages or remove existing label messages, edit the
<code>.github/label-messager.json</code> configuration file.</details>
alexcrichton updated PR #10235.
alexcrichton updated PR #10235.
alexcrichton updated PR #10235.
alexcrichton has marked PR #10235 as ready for review.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-fuzz-reviewers for a review on PR #10235.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #10235.
alexcrichton requested dicej for a review on PR #10235.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #10235.
alexcrichton commented on PR #10235:
Ok should be ready to go now.
pchickey submitted PR review.
alexcrichton merged PR #10235.
Last updated: Feb 28 2025 at 02:27 UTC