Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 26 2025 at 23:22): Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 26 2025 at 23:22):saulecabrera opened PR #10117 from saulecabrera:fix-standards-compliant-link to bytecodealliance:main:
See https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/10116
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 26 2025 at 23:22):saulecabrera requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #10117.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 26 2025 at 23:22):saulecabrera requested fitzgen for a review on PR #10117.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 26 2025 at 23:25):saulecabrera commented on PR #10117:
One thing that I noticed is that the top level README, Standards Compliant links to https://docs.wasmtime.dev/stability-tiers.html, however, in the
wasmtimecrate it links to https://docs.wasmtime.dev/stability-wasm-proposals.html and I'm not sure if this is intended. It seems that the main README should also point to https://docs.wasmtime.dev/stability-wasm-proposals.html?
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 27 2025 at 14:57):abrown submitted PR review.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 27 2025 at 15:00):abrown commented on PR #10117:
It seems that the main README should also point to https://docs.wasmtime.dev/stability-wasm-proposals.html?
Yeah, that would make more sense to me as well.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 27 2025 at 15:17):abrown merged PR #10117.
Last updated: Feb 28 2025 at 03:10 UTC