Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 17 2025 at 23:18): Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 17 2025 at 23:18):alexcrichton opened PR #10046 from alexcrichton:arm-runner to bytecodealliance:main:
Let's see if we can run our aarch64 tests natively instead of through QEMU emulation...
prtest:linux-arm64
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 17 2025 at 23:18):alexcrichton requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #10046.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 17 2025 at 23:18):alexcrichton requested fitzgen for a review on PR #10046.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 17 2025 at 23:29):alexcrichton closed without merge PR #10046.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jan 17 2025 at 23:29):alexcrichton commented on PR #10046:
Well that was ... exciting!
- For the runners that passed, looks like this is about 2x faster (probably in large part due to not building an optimized test suite on top of removing emulation costs)
- One runner died, with not really much of an indication as to why
- From what I can tell I can't see in the metadata of the runners whether it's arm64 or x64. That being said it downloaded/uses arm64 rustc's, so seems like it's arm64
Seems like it's good to have in our pocket and when it's more generally available we'll use it, but otherwise for the time being perhaps a bit rocky to use.
Last updated: Jan 24 2025 at 00:11 UTC