Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / Issue #1908 Chore: update various crates' `obj...

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 22 2020 at 11:39):

github-actions[bot] commented on Issue #1908:

Subscribe to Label Action

cc @bnjbvr

<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift", "cranelift:module"

Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.

Learn more.
</details>

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 22 2020 at 12:13):

tschneidereit commented on Issue #1908:

Turns out more lockfile updates are needed to make this pass :( I won't be able to get to that today, and probably not for another few days.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 23 2020 at 16:50):

pchickey commented on Issue #1908:

The latest wast is 20.0.0 - should we just go all the way to that?

I'll prepare the corresponding PR in WASI for witx now.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 23 2020 at 16:52):

tschneidereit commented on Issue #1908:

The latest wast is 20.0.0 - should we just go all the way to that?

Ah, good call—we definitely should!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 23 2020 at 17:02):

pchickey edited a comment on Issue #1908:

The latest wast is 20.0.0 - should we just go all the way to that?

I have prepared the corresponding PR in WASI for witx: https://github.com/WebAssembly/WASI/pull/291

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 01 2020 at 14:12):

yurydelendik commented on Issue #1908:

Landing it as update for object.

The latest wast is 20.0.0 - should we just go all the way to that?

Let's land wast update independently.

Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC