whitequark commented on Issue #1788:
cc @iximeow
github-actions[bot] commented on Issue #1788:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @bnjbvr
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift", "cranelift:meta"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- bnjbvr: cranelift
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
whitequark commented on Issue #1788:
No logs for failed builds?..
tschneidereit commented on Issue #1788:
No logs for failed builds?..
Yeah, something's wrong here. I just retriggered the tests in the hope that this was an intermittent infra issue.
whitequark commented on Issue #1788:
I just retriggered the tests in the hope that this was an intermittent infra issue.
I think that broke again, though less severely.
iximeow commented on Issue #1788:
I tried rerunning again (because why not) only to see the same mac builds fail. Still no logs or indication of how to acquire them..
tschneidereit commented on Issue #1788:
Just tried again, because indeed: why not, but no change. Given that
- the failures are all on macOS, yet this PR doesn't do anything macOS specific
- the failures happen well before anything this PR changes comes into play
- we've since had multiple successful runs in other PRs
I wonder if something's just borked about this PR.@whitequark would you be up for opening a fresh PR for these changes? :fingers_crossed:that makes it go away.
tschneidereit edited a comment on Issue #1788:
Just tried again, because indeed: why not, but no change. Given that
- the failures are all on macOS, yet this PR doesn't do anything macOS specific
- the failures happen well before anything this PR changes comes into play
- we've since had multiple successful runs in other PRs
I wonder if something's just borked about this PR.
@whitequark would you be up for opening a fresh PR for these changes? :fingers_crossed:that makes it go away.
whitequark commented on Issue #1788:
@tschneidereit https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/1794
tschneidereit commented on Issue #1788:
@whitequark thank you! Given that #1794 worked, would it make sense to close this and open a new PR with identical patches? It seems implausible that the difference in code chances between this PR and #1794 would translate into this difference in CI success.
whitequark commented on Issue #1788:
Given that #1794 worked, would it make sense to close this and open a new PR with identical patches? It seems implausible that the difference in code chances between this PR and #1794 would translate into this difference in CI success.
Er, sorry, I actually made a mistake here--I pushed a wrong branch. Let me do the right thing...
whitequark commented on Issue #1788:
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC