Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / Issue #1756 Move SingleFunctionCompiler into i...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 26 2020 at 03:27):

github-actions[bot] commented on Issue #1756:

Subscribe to Label Action

cc @bnjbvr

<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift"

Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.

Learn more.
</details>

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 26 2020 at 22:44):

abrown commented on Issue #1756:

cc: @alexcrichton, @yurydelendik: I saw that you were moving stuff around in wasmtime-jit in #1761 and wondered if you had any better ideas of where to put this SingleFunctionCompiler... it probably needs to stay in Cranelift-land but I'm checking just in case there is a better place it should go.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 27 2020 at 15:32):

alexcrichton commented on Issue #1756:

Ah I think #1761 is largely just juggling wasmtime data structures and the code produced by cranelift, so I don't think it's too too connected to this. As for how this is organized, I don't have too many opinions myself!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Dec 08 2020 at 17:56):

abrown commented on Issue #1756:

Too old!


Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC