Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / Issue #1617 Cranelift aarch64: support referen...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 28 2020 at 12:34):

bnjbvr opened Issue #1617:

This will imply some work in regalloc.rs to tell where spilled ref-typed values might be, and some integration in the new backend.

cc @julian-seward1 @cfallin

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 28 2020 at 12:34):

bnjbvr labeled Issue #1617:

This will imply some work in regalloc.rs to tell where spilled ref-typed values might be, and some integration in the new backend.

cc @julian-seward1 @cfallin

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 28 2020 at 12:34):

bnjbvr labeled Issue #1617:

This will imply some work in regalloc.rs to tell where spilled ref-typed values might be, and some integration in the new backend.

cc @julian-seward1 @cfallin

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 28 2020 at 12:34):

github-actions[bot] commented on Issue #1617:

Subscribe to Label Action

cc @bnjbvr

<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift"

Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.

Learn more.
</details>

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 28 2020 at 12:53):

bjorn3 commented on Issue #1617:

This will imply some work in regalloc.rs to tell where spilled ref-typed values might be

Also for refs stored in registers, right?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 28 2020 at 13:07):

bnjbvr commented on Issue #1617:

Also for refs stored in registers, right?

Eventually yes, but we don't require it in the short term at least in Spidermonkey, which scans the stack only at times where everything has been spilled onto the stack. (I wonder if that was accidentally working with the old regalloc, because it would inefficiently spill callee-preserved registers across a call...)

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 28 2020 at 14:09):

julian-seward1 commented on Issue #1617:

Sure; this will require tracking which VirtualRanges are ref-typed, or something like that. It might turn into a whole barrel of fun once we take into account copy coalescing, too.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 28 2020 at 14:13):

bjorn3 commented on Issue #1617:

It would be nice to immediately do the more general version of tracking which Value is stored where. That is necessary to implement debuginfo for locals.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 18 2020 at 04:14):

cfallin commented on Issue #1617:

Closing now, given that #1852 and subsequent bugfixes have landed; #1886 will track the wasmtime-specific work (which seems mainly to involve getting the right debug-info bits in place for the stack walk to work).

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 18 2020 at 04:14):

cfallin closed Issue #1617:

This will imply some work in regalloc.rs to tell where spilled ref-typed values might be, and some integration in the new backend.

cc @julian-seward1 @cfallin


Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC