Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 17 2020 at 16:53): Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 17 2020 at 16:53):alexcrichton opened Issue #1535:
It looks like Go at least only supports MinGW as a toolchain to link with, but wasmtiem does not currently have MinGW support. If we'd like to support Windows support for Wasmtime in Go I think we'll need to add a MinGW target as well as CI/releases for it.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 17 2020 at 16:53):alexcrichton labeled Issue #1535:
It looks like Go at least only supports MinGW as a toolchain to link with, but wasmtiem does not currently have MinGW support. If we'd like to support Windows support for Wasmtime in Go I think we'll need to add a MinGW target as well as CI/releases for it.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 17 2020 at 17:31):tschneidereit commented on Issue #1535:
Do you know how complicated that would be initially—and how much of a maintenance burden it'd be on an ongoing basis? If neither is a concern, this makes sense to me. Otherwise, I think we should let the be driven by use cases.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 17 2020 at 17:36):tschneidereit commented on Issue #1535:
Ah, I now see the wasmtime-go issue. I guess the question is how many people will want to run Go programs on Windows, which I don't have a good handle on.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 17 2020 at 17:46):alexcrichton commented on Issue #1535:
Oh sorry I should have clarified, but I definitely agree that we should let use cases and difficulty of implementation guide this in terms of priorities. I don't think it's clear how motivated this is right now (I don't know how often it'd be wanted on Go for Windows). I suspect this would be relatively difficult because of stack unwinding, but I might give this a go later today and see if it "trivially works" or "trivially doesn't work". Basically I think it's probably worth a little bit of effort to see how much effort it would take for us to support this.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 17 2020 at 17:55):tschneidereit commented on Issue #1535:
That makes a lot of sense to me, yes. Thank you for the clarification!
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 17 2020 at 20:31):alexcrichton commented on Issue #1535:
Turns out that with https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/1490 all tests pass. I think there's probably some difference in how big the stack is when a segfault comes in which causes issues today, but once https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/1490 lands I can look into adding this to CI. Don't think it'll be too too hard!
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 24 2020 at 22:45):fitzgen closed Issue #1535:
It looks like Go at least only supports MinGW as a toolchain to link with, but wasmtiem does not currently have MinGW support. If we'd like to support Windows support for Wasmtime in Go I think we'll need to add a MinGW target as well as CI/releases for it.
Last updated: Oct 23 2024 at 20:03 UTC