alexcrichton commented on Issue #1526:
I should note that I tried to write
#[should_panic]
for all failing tests on aarch64 so if something is fixed we can be sure to enable the regression test. Unfortunately though this directive doesn't work for test functions returning a result, so many wasmtime tests are simply#[ignore]
github-actions[bot] commented on Issue #1526:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @bnjbvr
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- bnjbvr: cranelift
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
github-actions[bot] commented on Issue #1526:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @fitzgen, @kubkon, @peterhuene
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift:module", "fuzzing", "wasi", "wasmtime:api", "wasmtime:c-api"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- fitzgen: fuzzing
- kubkon: wasi
- peterhuene: wasmtime:api, wasmtime:c-api
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
alexcrichton commented on Issue #1526:
Updated with a comment about the new semantics of
test_run
alexcrichton commented on Issue #1526:
Ok should be green now to account for recent merges.
alexcrichton commented on Issue #1526:
Ok I've pushed up a commit which accounts for https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/1569 and recently fixed tests too.
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 13:07 UTC