Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / Issue #1282 Add capability (to cranelift) to g...

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 11 2020 at 15:32):

yurydelendik opened Issue #1282:

This is a continuation of #53

We save .debug_frame section in wasmtime's JIT and wasm2obj. It will be nice to move this capability to the cranelift level (e.g. cranelift-faerie?).

This issue may intersect with #1181 for linux and macos platforms.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 11 2020 at 17:58):

bjorn3 commented on Issue #1282:

e.g. cranelift-faerie?

Rather add common code to for example cranelift-module and then implement this in both cranelift-faerie and cranelift-object.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 11 2020 at 19:12):

iximeow commented on Issue #1282:

Should I rebase https://github.com/bytecodealliance/cranelift/pull/902 against wasmtime? That PR added this feature to cranelift-faerie, though I had taken the lack of approval and your comment about cranelift-module to be a request for an approach more like #1181 (specifically: less focused on cranelift-faerie specifically)

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 11 2020 at 19:17):

iximeow edited a comment on Issue #1282:

Should I rebase https://github.com/bytecodealliance/cranelift/pull/902 against wasmtime? That PR added this feature to cranelift-faerie, though I had taken the lack of approval and your comment about cranelift-module to be a request for an approach more like #1181 (less focused on cranelift-faerie specifically)

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 11 2020 at 20:39):

yurydelendik labeled Issue #1282:

This is a continuation of #53

We save .debug_frame section in wasmtime's JIT and wasm2obj. It will be nice to move this capability to the cranelift level (e.g. cranelift-faerie?).

This issue may intersect with #1181 for linux and macos platforms.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 18 2020 at 18:51):

marmistrz commented on Issue #1282:

Why does this issue close #1284? These two changes seem completely unrelated

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 18 2020 at 18:54):

bjorn3 commented on Issue #1282:

Cranelift recently got merged into the wasmtime repo. All issues have been migrated to the wasmtime repo, but this has renumbered all cranelift issues.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 01 2020 at 09:57):

bnjbvr labeled Issue #1282:

This is a continuation of #53

We save .debug_frame section in wasmtime's JIT and wasm2obj. It will be nice to move this capability to the cranelift level (e.g. cranelift-faerie?).

This issue may intersect with #1181 for linux and macos platforms.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 01 2020 at 09:57):

github-actions[bot] commented on Issue #1282:

Subscribe to Label Action

This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift"

<details> <summary>Users Subscribed to "cranelift"</summary>

</details>

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.

Learn more.

Last updated: Oct 23 2024 at 20:03 UTC