Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / Issue #1270 Support WASI from the `wasmtime` c...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 10 2020 at 18:02):

alexcrichton opened Issue #1270:

Currently WASI support is provided by the wasmtime-wasi crate. This feels like it's a bit too much of a speedbump to pull in an extra crate and configure it just right to get support for WASI. I think that we'll want more turnkey (or at least documented) support in the wasmtime crate itself.

I think what I'd propose personally is:

With my idea we still wouldn't really have turnkey support, but it's at least all in one crate and will be documented better than it is today. I think https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/727 will be where we want to figure out truly what a turnkey solution looks like.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 10 2020 at 18:02):

alexcrichton labeled Issue #1270:

Currently WASI support is provided by the wasmtime-wasi crate. This feels like it's a bit too much of a speedbump to pull in an extra crate and configure it just right to get support for WASI. I think that we'll want more turnkey (or at least documented) support in the wasmtime crate itself.

I think what I'd propose personally is:

With my idea we still wouldn't really have turnkey support, but it's at least all in one crate and will be documented better than it is today. I think https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/727 will be where we want to figure out truly what a turnkey solution looks like.


Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC