@Badeend I'm upgrading my wasi-libc
fork to use the latest WASI RC. I see you removed TCP no-delay. What should we do if setsockopt
is called with TCP_NODELAY
? Just ignore it?
Or return an error if the value being set is zero?
Did you see the pr I've posted? I already updated it for you
oops, no
ugh, I didn't get an email about it for some reason. Thanks for the PR.
I think removing support for TCP_NODELAY
is going to break one of my test cases. tokio-postgres
sets it and will error out and refuse to connect if that fails. Could we accept nonzero values as a no-op and only return an error if someone tries to set it to zero?
Ah, I didn't get an email because I wasn't "watching" my own fork on GitHub :face_palm: Just fixed that
A message was moved here from #wasi > Container containing WASI-SDK and wasmtime? by Joel Dice.
Could we accept nonzero values as a no-op (...) ?
Yes :+1: , but not for the reason you've documented. :joy_cat:
I've created a follow-up PR. Hopefully that clears it up.
Thanks (as always) for the PR. Out of curiosity: what's the reason this is not yet supported in wasi-sockets
? Are there portability concerns?
Well the TLDR would be: preview2 had to be shipped, and it wasn't clear yet (nor specified) how TCP_NODELAY would affect wasi:io input- and output streams
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC