Alex Crichton (May 18 2020 at 13:52): Alex Crichton (May 18 2020 at 13:52):@fitzgen (he/him) wdyt about not running peepmatic fuzzers on oss-fuzz? Since we've got a number of folks subscribed to that it may be best to try to keep it high signal-to-noise in terms of notifications.
fitzgen (he/him) (May 18 2020 at 15:30):So far there has been a single timeout reported from peepmatic's fuzz targets. I wouldn't consider that significantly lowering the signal-to-noise ratio, and I don't think it warrants as strong a reaction as disabling all of peepmatic's fuzz targets. Running fuzz targets continuously is super valuable, but if as time goes on it turns out that if it really is drowning out other reports, than we can reconsider.
Alex Crichton (May 18 2020 at 15:41):@fitzgen (he/him) sorry I don't mean to say it's noisy or we should turn it off, I mean mostly if we should run it on our CI instead of oss-fuzz as well
fitzgen (he/him) (May 18 2020 at 15:44):I would prefer to do the opposite, actually: turn it off in CI (still checking that the targets builds OK, but not running them) and keep them running in oss-fuzz
Alex Crichton (May 18 2020 at 15:45):seems fine to me yeah, and makes sense that we can see if it actually becomes too noisy before doing anything
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC