g:\dev\test>lldb.exe -- z:\dev\wasm\wasmtime\target\release\wasmtime.exe -g .\test.wasm
(lldb) target create "z:\\dev\\wasm\\wasmtime\\target\\release\\wasmtime.exe"
Current executable set to 'z:\dev\wasm\wasmtime\target\release\wasmtime.exe' (x86_64).
(lldb) settings set -- target.run-args "-g" ".\\test.wasm"
(lldb) b test.cpp:7
Breakpoint 1: no locations (pending).
WARNING: Unable to resolve breakpoint to any actual locations.
(lldb) r
Process 13668 launched: 'z:\dev\wasm\wasmtime\target\release\wasmtime.exe' (x86_64)
1 location added to breakpoint 1
Process 13668 stopped
when I query globals from the lldb API it seems I'm getting another copy of the locals. something's not quite right.
also tried
fr v -g
same result.
Tried native equivalent as sanity check.
correct lldb command : fr v -g
(lldb) b test.cpp:7
Breakpoint 1: where = test`Thing::Thing(int) + 15 at test.cpp:8:13, address = 0x00000000004011ef
(lldb) r
Process 10008 launched: '/home/x/dev/test/test' (x86_64)
Process 10008 stopped
Into the code :
utils.rs : append_vmctx_info generates DWARF DW_TAG_variable which should expose globals, if any.
That calls build_with_locals in expression.rs to form a list of things to add to the dwarf data.
An inspect of build_with_locals in expression.rs seems to show locals only are built - no mention of globals.
... which is what we're seeing in the debugger.
Hence initial conclusion is : wasmtime debug mode emits only locals. Global variable export implementation needs to be added.
Disclaimer: rust noob, dwarf noob :)
If I've missed anything, misunderstood, etc. correction welcome. First reading of the code.
Severity: High. Standard debugging pipeline not complete until this has been resolved.
we've got parse_global_section in wasmtime\cranelift\wasm\src\sections_translator.rs
perhaps can work from that.
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/3439
(lldb) fr v -g -l
to print globals only, apparently. (globals, no locals).
pushing my luck, but if I could get a little assistance from a senior dev on this, it'd be appreciated. I'll stumble through it eventually but someone already familiar with rust/dwarf/jit interface could likely close it faster with less chance of errors. not really a noob task. maybe that's a cop out.
then we have a solid debug pipeline afaik. needs more testing but that's the last issue I'm aware of.
lldb issue - teemperor is reviewer. we get on ok, so maybe I have to throw my lldb is the test argument over there :)
lldb aside, continued. I guess they want something like this to test it.
https://llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html
then its all within their tech tree. on it when globals issue resolved. essentials first.
k, we get the rust noob version :) failing at first fence :) can't inspect with debugger coz stuff that's being injected is 2 debuggers deep (maybe lldb intercept can be disabled), so its logging. have log on screen with RUST_LOG=trace
far too much I don't want to see & doesn't seem to be a filter other than knowing specific module you want to monitor which I don't yet.
put following in wasmtime\crates\cranelift\src\debug\transform\utils.rs
warn!("TODO: inject_globals_here.");
// Build vmctx_die's DW_TAG_subprogram for set
method
Won't even compile :( How do I place logging there plz. Can implement custom file logger if I need to, but first step is to ask if there's a standard way I can log from there. Input welcome :)
seems a simple println works from there :) progress. if at glacial pace.
shouldn't be there. learning my way around.
generate_simulated_dwarf is entrypoint.
DebugInfoData doesn't seem to contain globals. only locals.
DebugPubNames/Types is globals ?
to answer my own q previously, dwarf 4 is generated. says so in transform_dwarf - irrelevant aside.
only a slight oversight :)
there's a GlobalVariable thing I've just come across in cranelift.
is that set incorrectly somehow & hence responsible for behaviour we're observing ?
.
make_global in func_environ.rs is called a few times with apparently zero index each time.
but as that's passed a function, I don't see how it's globals. so confused.com
to cover statics maybe.
whatever it is, same index each time seems odd. disclaimer: don't understand the code yet, might be fine.
that's driven by Operator::GlobalSet which apparently is called thru set_global which doesn't show up in a source tree search so still confused.
seems right place as there's Operator::LocalSet there too. zero index every time sounding fishy, but I don't know how that code is driven.
Dropped in
println!("Operator::GlobalSet {} ", global_index);
0 each time.
not called thru set_global, misread. that's some kind of built in I dont understand as rust noob.
don't know what calls that stuff.
does rust have an diagnostics magic I can drop in to say who called me, plz ? can't run debugger there without modding lldb for passthrough. will skip that if possible.
actually, lldb might get me that on linux. native debug broken on windows bcoz pe/pdb code incomplete.
from my simple test.cpp program, I get : https://pastebin.com/rNE64Xa9
GlobalSet index always 0
Q1: What's calling that ?
Q2: Should it always be 0 ? Does that sound right ?
Operator::LocalSet 0
Operator::LocalSet 2
Operator::LocalSet 1
Operator::LocalSet 0
Operator::LocalSet 0
Operator::LocalSet 1
Operator::LocalSet 2
Operator::GlobalSet 0
Operator::GlobalSet 0
Operator::LocalSet 2
Process 16832 stopped
cranelift_wasm::code_translator::translate_operator::h8f0891072d4134db + 68245
wasmtime
cranelift_wasm::code_translator::translate_operator::h8f0891072d4134db:cranelift_wasm::code_translator::translate_operator::h8f0891072d4134db + 68245
wasmtime
cranelift_wasm::code_translator::translate_operator::h8f0891072d4134db:with :
Operator::GlobalSet { global_index } => {
println!("Operator::GlobalSet {} ", global_index);
unsafe { std::intrinsics::breakpoint(); }
index always 0 sounds wrong to me, but still getting head around what's going on.
added second global to test program to cover case where that index should always be zero. with 2 globals it can't be. I think.
but still always zero. so perhaps root cause.
& even if we only get 1, we're not seeing it at the other end, so still confused.
behaviour explained by incomplete code. so maybe that's just how it is. global index bug, not noticed bcoz globals not translated.
Added some more debug.
In GlobalSet
+ println!(" builder.ins().store flags:{} val:{} addr:{} offset:{}", flags, val, addr, offset);
builder.ins().store(flags, val, addr, offset);
dunno if you can do that, but anyway. seems a little more variety so perhaps ok. unsure where that ends up yet.
Operator::GlobalSet 0
Operator::GlobalSet 0
Operator::GlobalSet 0
builder.ins().store flags: notrap aligned val:v10 addr:v11 offset:+176
builder.ins().store flags: notrap aligned val:v10 addr:v11 offset:+176
Operator::GlobalSet 0
builder.ins().store flags: notrap aligned val:v10 addr:v11 offset:+176
builder.ins().store flags: notrap aligned val:v7 addr:v8 offset:+176
Operator::GlobalSet 0
builder.ins().store flags: notrap aligned val:v34 addr:v35 offset:+176
Operator::GlobalSet 0
Operator::GlobalSet 0
builder.ins().store flags: notrap aligned val:v26 addr:v27 offset:+176
builder.ins().store flags: notrap aligned val:v34 addr:v35 offset:+176
Operator::GlobalSet 0
builder.ins().store flags: notrap aligned val:v93 addr:v94 offset:+176
Operator::GlobalSet 0
builder.ins().store flags: notrap aligned val:v8 addr:v9 offset:+176
Operator::GlobalSet 0
builder.ins().store flags: notrap aligned val:v8 addr:v9 offset:+176
Operator::GlobalSet 0
builder.ins().store flags: notrap aligned val:v53 addr:v54 offset:+176
Operator::GlobalSet 0
builder.ins().store flags: notrap aligned val:v2316 addr:v2317 offset:+176
made one a float, everything still comes thru as i32. so not a clue what's going on yet.
silence is weird. don't some folks know how this stuff works ?
switched from cpp test to absolute basic c test.
test.c
float my_global_float = 2.5f;
int main() {
return (int)(my_global_float);
}
nothing coming thru, so the globals I was seeing were probably runtime built-in stuff.
& dwarf-dump:
.\test.wasm: file format WASM
.debug_info contents:
0x00000000: Compile Unit: length = 0x0000005a, format = DWARF32, version = 0x0004, abbr_offset = 0x0000, addr_size = 0x04 (next unit at 0x0000005e)
0x0000000b: DW_TAG_compile_unit
DW_AT_producer ("clang version 11.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 176249bd6732a8044d457092ed932768724a6f06)")
DW_AT_language (DW_LANG_C99)
DW_AT_name ("test.c")
DW_AT_stmt_list (0x00000000)
DW_AT_comp_dir ("g:\\dev\\test")
DW_AT_low_pc (0x0000002f)
DW_AT_high_pc (0x000000a4)
0x00000026: DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_name ("my_global_float")
DW_AT_type (0x00000037 "float")
DW_AT_external (true)
DW_AT_decl_file ("g:\dev\test\.\test.c")
DW_AT_decl_line (1)
DW_AT_location (DW_OP_addr 0x400)
0x00000037: DW_TAG_base_type
DW_AT_name ("float")
DW_AT_encoding (DW_ATE_float)
DW_AT_byte_size (0x04)
0x0000003e: DW_TAG_base_type
DW_AT_name ("int")
DW_AT_encoding (DW_ATE_signed)
DW_AT_byte_size (0x04)
0x00000045: DW_TAG_subprogram
DW_AT_low_pc (0x0000002f)
DW_AT_high_pc (0x000000a4)
DW_AT_frame_base (DW_OP_WASM_location 0x0 0x2, DW_OP_stack_value)
DW_AT_name ("main")
DW_AT_decl_file ("g:\dev\test\.\test.c")
DW_AT_decl_line (3)
DW_AT_type (0x0000003e "int")
DW_AT_external (true)
0x0000005d: NULL
that test too simple apparently, even with opts off its eliminated global somehow.
so went with test.c :
float my_global_float = 2.5f;
float my_func()
{
return my_global_float;
}
int main()
{
return (int) my_func();
}
which generates this :
GlobalVariable::Memory gv:gv3 ty:i32
builder.ins().store flags: notrap aligned val:v9 addr:v10 offset:+96
Operator::GlobalSet 0
GlobalVariable::Memory gv:gv3 ty:i32
builder.ins().store flags: notrap aligned val:v25 addr:v26 offset:+96
2 global references, both i32. can't see how that's right.
workaround: to inspect globals in debugger, load a reference into a local & inspect that. compile works, debug currently has a gap.
yury - you're quiet :) any advice ?
@mozilla - can we get a tiny bit of yury time on this, please (if he's willing) ? its quite hard.
fixing this effectively unlocks wasmtime as far as I can see. aside from exceptions, which can wait (our use case anyway), we can go into production with this once debugging is solid. arguably now, though prefer it not to be wonky.
we run with wasmtime in production, hopefully prove it solid, then it drops into firefox later. everyone wins.
last thing stopping this being wasmtime 1.0 unless there are any other mvp gaps I'm unaware of.
& if I'm understanding correctly, appears gap is all the way into cranelift which isn't parsing debug globals correctly. perhaps requires multiple seniors to resolve.
even further into basics. can we run a standalone cranelift test to determine what its doing with debug parsing of globals. surprised this hasn't been tested, but its like that with all bugs - the thing you didn't think about.
to get a sane debug/devel environment for this, seems we need a test program that loads a wasm then calls build_artifacts on it.
that should detect & reference globals.
all this : https://docs.wasmtime.dev/api/wasmtime/struct.Global.html
so perhaps gap is smaller than feared. we'll see :)
can step thru a rust test app now have decoupled from lldb so can see what's going on.
A little progress.
Put following wasmtime/rust API test program together, based on introductory sample.
test.c
float my_global=5;
void mytest()
{
my_global = 3;
}
int main() {
int i = my_global;
return i;
}
The global is located :)
so ... ummm ... cranelift exposes, so dwarf conversion issue. if only we had an expert on that we could borrow for an hour or two with many beers owed :)
could be an export issue. had to export-all for this test app, haven't done so previously so will check if the issue.
is that the issue ? is cranelift only passing on exported globals ?
that's valid for standard runtime but not for debug mode. debug mode should get everything.
my test app has debug mode set.
early in testing but cranelift seems to propagate all with clang -Wl,--export-all
without it, not getting even the function.
so export-all appears to be cranelift workaround. whether it goes anywhere from there, don't yet know.
this needs verifying. to avoid us going off on wrong tangents.
bit early as still not 100% sure but anyhow, here's test files : http://advance-software.com/misc/wasmtime_test.zip
wasm shell scipts a bit off as resolving on windows, but is simple stuff. a hardwired path to fix up.
extract same level as wasmtime, not inside that tree.
path is Module::from_file in main.rs to where your test wasm is.
weird. if I export anything, can't get lldb to hit a breakpoint. so workaround won't work, so gotta figure out why its doing that.
looking at wasmtime\crates\environ\src\module_environ.rs
Payload::ExportSection(exports) - noticing my global ends up in there.
next up, see if I can follow it into Payload::GlobalSection(globals)
& then figure out how we hook into that so we don't have export constraint.
still no fan of rust. looking forwards to getting back to c++ :)
any fixes for variable is optimized away (visual studio, rust debugging), following "cargo build" which is debug config, plz.
the friction to new amazing system is bits are still wonky.
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/fr7s7f/whats_the_latest_on_overoptimization_in_debug/
seems a known issue. an aside. can work around it. will use my own debugger gui soon :)
in build_artifacts , engine.config().tunables
parse_wasm_debuginfo is false. that seems wrong.
experimental - might not be this, we'll see.
pub fn debug_info(&mut self, enable: bool) -> &mut Self {
self.tunables.generate_native_debuginfo = enable;
// ADV_SW_PATCH[experimental]:
// Required so we are able to emit globals - have to parse them so we know what to emit :)
self.tunables.parse_wasm_debuginfo = enable;
self
}
not seeing test app global float getting parsed even with that. think there's implementation missing but don't fully comprehend the parser yet.
we've got this thing :
use wasmparser::{
self, Data, DataKind, DataSectionReader, Element, ElementItem, ElementItems, ElementKind,
ElementSectionReader, Export, ExportSectionReader, ExternalKind, FunctionSectionReader,
GlobalSectionReader, GlobalType, ImportSectionEntryType, ImportSectionReader,
MemorySectionReader, MemoryType, NameSectionReader, Naming, Operator, TableSectionReader,
TableType, TagSectionReader, TagType, TypeDef, TypeSectionReader,
};
& this which we want registering in .debug_info section.
0x00000026: DW_TAG_variable [2]
DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x00000078] = "my_global")
DW_AT_type [DW_FORM_ref4] (cu + 0x0037 => {0x00000037} "float")
DW_AT_external [DW_FORM_flag_present] (true)
DW_AT_decl_file [DW_FORM_data1] ("g:\dev\test\.\test.c")
DW_AT_decl_line [DW_FORM_data1] (1)
DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_exprloc] (DW_OP_addr 0x400)
I'm not clear if that should run through GlobalSectionReader or TagSectionReader.
or some other.
slow, but I think we're making progress. not so scary now, just working thru it.
debug_info section containing the variable we want is handled via register_dwarf_section, via Payload::CustomSection.
that ends up in ModuleEnvironment : self.results[0].debuginfo.dwarf.debug_info.debug_info_section
& isn't parsed - just reference to the section location & length - at that point anyway.
I guess we follow that up to the emit. unsure how we morph from wasm dwarf to target dwarf but it must be in there somewhere as the rest does it.
has_unparsed_debuginfo flag is badly named. the debuginfo section isn't parsed, its just registered.
so ... we can parse the debug info section, even if it means writing that code from scratch, we can somehow map from wasm addresses to target addresses & we can emit dwarf. so we can do this :)
& we've got this thing in use already : https://github.com/gimli-rs/gimli
Loc is terrible abbreviation in that as initially thought it meant local when it in fact means location. code doesn't run faster with shorter variable names :) just write out the whole word.
can gimli decode debuginfo section to extract global DW_TAG_variable entities ?
if not, we can implement as necessary.
https://github.com/gimli-rs/gimli
:)
https://github.com/gimli-rs/gimli/blob/master/examples/simple_line.rs
that's me on hold until next week with this as real life calls, but feel free to carry on if the mood takes anyone :)
looks like you need to load & parse each top level DW_TAG_variable yourself, but that's not so hard.
function statics are also technically globals but assuming function locals deliver those. should verify.
& that load/parse should probably end up in gimli so its there for the next guy.
back to it, weekend off cancelled. this needs nailing anyway.
if a global is at some memory location in input wasm, is it at same location in emitted wasm ? that'd make it easy & can't think why it'd need to be different unless there are different alignment constraints.
emit_dwarf takes a debug_info so if I can figure out where the globals section is going, it feeds into that & almost done.
have no idea what GlobalSection stuff is all about. our global doesn't end up there. seems to be used for some kind of built ins only.
this code is really light on comments. too much so imo.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC